Legal Opinion
Melton v. Lewis
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1889No. 6971PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Coleman. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Timmons.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
Snodgrass & Woodward having recovered .a judgment against M. M. & P. M. Whittington about June 16, 1887, caused a writ of garnishment to be served on appellant requiring him to .answer as to his indebtedness to either of the Whittingtons and as to all other matters as provided by statutes in such cases.
Appellant alleges that he requested Snodgrass to write his answer, which he refused to do, and that at the same time he informed Snodgrass “that he did not have any effects of the said Whittingtons or either of them in Fis possession, and that he did not know of any other…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Oklahoma Petroleum & Gasoline Co. v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Jones Hardware & Furniture Co. v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Durfee Mineral Co. v. City Nat. Bank of TempleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- R. A. Toombs Sash & Door Co. v. JamisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Kentucky Oil Corporation v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.