Legal Opinion

Tillman v. Janks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1890No. 3367PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Harrison County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wi-iite, P. J.

§172. Sale of personal property; possession of, remaining with vendor, prima facie fraudulent; estoppel; facts held to establish; case stated. One Irvine, who was running a saloon in the city of Marshall, owed appellant, Tillman, $600, and owed appellee, Janks, $1,200. He was indebted to other parties, and both Tillman and Janks knew him to be in failing circumstances, if not entirely, insolvent. On the 25th of March, one Strauss, as agent of Tillman, purchased of Irvine for Tillman three barrels of whisky which were in the saloon, for which Irvine was to be credited…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Blanton & Nunnally v. Langston & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. L. H. Woods & Co. v. Half, Weiss & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Brewer v. BlantonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hernandez v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API