Legal Opinion

De Watteville v. Sims

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1914No. 3005Published

Action by B. C. Sims against Charles De Watteville and others on a note to foreclose a mortgage lien.' Judgment for plaintiff and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

Plaintiffs 'in error will be designated as defendants, (except when Charles and Mary De ¡Watteville, against whom judgment was taken by default, may be designated as mortgagors, or the other plaintiffs in error,, who were not parties to the note or mortgage, may be designated as resisting defendants), and the defendant in error will *711be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. The essential facts, when not stated, are necessarily presupposed by this opinion, and will therefore be understood.

In the absence of exceptional facts —…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Keokuk & Western Railroad v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Smith v. KernochenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API