Legal Opinion

LaMack v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 1966No. 65-809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff in the trial court appeals a final judgment dismissing her complaint with prejudice. The question presented is whether the complaint, in which plaintiff alleged that a restaurant served her food containing a foreign substance, stated a cause of action for negligence. We hold that the complaint stated a cause of action and reverse the order dismissing the complaint.

Appellant’s complaint was originally in two counts; the first on the theory of implied warranty, and the second on the theory of negligence. The trial judge dismissed the count alleging negligence upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kislak v. KreedianSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. American District Electric Protective Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Romans v. Warm Mineral Springs, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. W. J. Kiely & Co. v. DickeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dayton Tire and Rubber Co. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API