Mathwig v. Drainage District No. 29
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Emmet District Oov/rt. — N. J. Lee, Judge. Appeal from a decree canceling certain drainage assessments.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
The drainage district in question .is No. 29, in Emmet County, and consists of a main, open ditch, several miles in length, and numérous laterals. The town of Huntington, which is included within the boundaries of the district, lies north of a public highway near the north line of the district. From the highway referred to,.extending in a south and southeasterly direction for approximately 3,953 feet, there is a 12-inch tile, which is a part of the drainage system, which empties into the open ditch. Several laterals *268are connected therewith. It appears without dispute in the evidence that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelley v. Drainage District No. 60Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Smith v. Monona-Harrison Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Mayne v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Thielen v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- LaGrange v. SkiffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morrow v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Haugen v. Humboldt-Kossuth Joint Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Walker v. Joint Drainage District No. 2 of Osceola & Dickinson CountiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Nelson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Jagodzinske v. County of MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.