Legal Opinion

BRYCE DAVIS, Appellant vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2025No. SD38856Published

1Opinion of the Court

In Division BRYCE DAVIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) No. SD38856 vs. ) ) FILED: July 23, 2025 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUTLER COUNTY Honorable Devin Kirby, Judge AFFIRMED Bryce Davis (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post- conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his attorney (“Plea Counsel”) rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Because Movant’s sole point alleging clear error by the motion court is without merit, we affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Pursuant to a negotiated plea…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. Oliphant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API