Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Taiwo Okusami, M.D. v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 31, 1992No. 91-7078Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSentelle, Circuit Judge

I concur in my colleagues’ affirmance of the dismissal of the counts alleging violations of the antitrust laws, intentional infliction of emotional distress, denial of “statutory due process,” and conspiracy. I dissent from my colleagues’ reversal of the dismissal of the counts of negligence and tortious interference.

At the outset, I wish to set forth a complete procedural history of the case at the district level in order to allay any fear the reader might harbor that the District Court failed to provide the plaintiff with the liberal standard of construction contemplated by the Federal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Greisman v. Newcomb HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Oscar S. Gray v. American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API