Legal Opinion

Hemphill Co. v. Davis Knitting Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1934No. Appeal 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This was a replevin action by Hemphill Company against H. B. Davis, trading as the Davis Knitting Company, in which Market Street Trust Company intervened claiming it had purchased the eight machines, sought to be replevied, at a constable’s sale under a distraint for rent. A counter bond having been filed, the action was for the value of the machines. The Hemphill Company, in its statement of claim, claimed title to eight knitting machines, alleging these had been leased to Davis. The trust company denied the title of the Hemphill Company, claiming an alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Esterly Machine Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Schmidt v. BaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Davis v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County1889
  4. Snyder v. BoringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Brisben v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Industrial Loan Society, Inc. v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. In re Dairyland, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1944
  3. United States v. Kemmerer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API