District of Columbia v. Washington Home Ownership Council, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentMack, Associate Judge
with whom NEWMAN, Chief Judge and PRYOR, Associate Judge, join:
The language of the Home Rule Act relating to the issue of successive emergency enactments is ambiguous. The legislative history is both meager and inconclusive. Nevertheless, based on this paucity of congressional direction, the majority has construed the Act as a very restrictive grant of legislative power. I submit such a narrow interpretation should only be made when the legislative history compels the conclusion that this was the explicit intent of Congress.
We are concerned here with the statutory construction of a small but…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.