Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Zielinski

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 8, 1961No. Ex. No. 10102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrost, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover damages growing out of the sale of a used Mercedes-Benz automobile by the defendant to the plaintiff. The case was tried before a justice of the superior court sitting without a jury and resulted in a decision for the defendant for costs. The case is here on the plaintiff’s single exception to the trial justice’s decision.

The amended declaration contains two counts, the first being on an express warranty whereby defendant promised plaintiff that the automobile was in excellent condition and was guaranteed for 64,000 miles, but that actually it was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roof, Trustee v. JerdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  2. Red Wing Manufacturing Co. v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brock v. Newmark Grain Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Neal v. FlintSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  5. Rosenburg v. Capital Cut Stone & Granite Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Newport Plaza Associates, L.P., Debtor. Newport Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Durfee Attleboro BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. F. R. Lepage Bakery, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Durfee v. NewportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Durfee v. NewportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API