Legal Opinion

Rowell v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1928No. 26974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The state’s tenth instruction, while inaccurately worded, viewed in connection with the other instructions, could not have misled the jury.

The state’s eleventh instruction, which defines malice as “the doing of a wrong act intentionally, without just cause or excuse,” is erroneous in that malice is a state of mind and not an act; but it was perfectly harmless, for “the doing of a wrong act intentionally, without just cause or excuse,” evidences malice.

Some of the other instructions complained of are inaccurate when considered alone, but the errors therein disappear when they are considered…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
  2. Lee v. HudsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Stokes v. TerrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API