Legal Opinion
Deutscher Tennis Bund v. ATP Tour Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 11, 2012No. 09-4361UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
ATP Tour, Inc., appeals the order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying ATP’s post-trial motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses after successfully defending against a suit brought by ATP member federations Deutscher Tennis Bund and Qatar Tennis Federation, and Rothenbaum Sports GMBH. For the reasons stated below, we vacate the order of the District Court and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
ATP is a not-for-profit Delaware membership corporation that governs an international men’s professional tennis tour.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- P.N., an Infant, Individually and by His Parent and Legal Guardian M.W. v. Clementon Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Tulowitzki v. Atlantic Richfield CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Columbia Venture, LLC v. Dewberry & Davis, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Deutscher Tennis Bund v. Atp Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. RaskinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- ATP Tour, Inc. v. Deutscher Tennis BundSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Ricardo Torres v. Precision Indus., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Pospisil v. ATP Tour, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Salzberg v. SciabacucchiSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Salzberg v. SciabacucchiSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.