Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Jacobsky
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 6, 1985Published
1Opinion of the Court
496 A.2d 646 (1985)
CITY OF PORTLAND
v.
Anthony J. JACOBSKY et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued September 14, 1984.
Decided August 6, 1985.
Mittel & Hefferan, Robert Edmond Mittel, (orally), Charles A. Lane, Portland, for plaintiff.
Longley, Whalen & Burke, E. James Burke, (orally), Lewiston, for DePaolo and Graten.
Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, John M.R. Paterson, (orally), Jeffrey T. Shedd, Portland, for Jacobsky, Stilphen, Discatio, Ratliff, McCarthy & Brown.
Daniel G. Lilley, E. Paul Eggert, Portland, for Campbell & Palmer.
Jeffco, May & Smart, Stephen Jeffco, Portsmouth, N.H., for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.