Legal Opinion
Thomas Bondurant v. City of Battle Ground
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2017No. 16-36085UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Thomas Bondurant and Michelle Bondu-rant appeal pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Blankenhorn v. City of Orange, 486 F.3d 463, 470 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment for the City of Battle Ground because the Bondurants failed to raise a genuine dispute -of material fact as to whether the alleged deprivations were caused by municipal policy, custom, or practice, or whether the allegedly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Dennis Edward EliasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tyrone Merritt v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Johnson v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bethune v. City of WashougalDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Peterson v. FletcherDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022