Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Rougeau

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while riding upon a truck owned and operated by the defendant.

The report contains all the evidence material to the questions reported and in substance is as follows: One. *374Pringle, a truckman in North Adams, employed the defendant, who was also engaged in a general trucking business, to transport a pool table from one residence to another in North Adams. The compensation to be paid the defendant therefor was to be computed upon the basis of the time taken to do the work. Pringle also employed the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Loftus v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. West v. PoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Flynn v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  2. Rollison v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Alderman v. NobleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. O'Brien v. BernoiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Epstein v. Simco Trading Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API