Legal Opinion

People v. Langlois

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1924No. Crim. No. 806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendants were found guilty of the crime of forgery and appeal to- this court from the order denying their motion for a new trial and the judgment of the court pronounced upon the verdict, finding them guilty of the offense charged in the information.

Two reasons are assigned for the reversal of the judgment and order above named; first, that the testimony is insufficient to sustain the verdict; secondly, that the court refused to give certain instructions asked for by defendants. The testimony shows that the defendants' passed the checks referred to in the information. The only question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. MarvichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API