Legal Opinion

Mazzu v. Darojo Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erroneously allowed the jury to predicate negligence on the defendant’s violation of a common-law duty (irrespective of the building ordinances) to furnish proper exits. In our opinion no such duty toward this plaintiff existed. The only basis for a finding of negligence in this case on the record before us is in the violation *634of the applicable provisions of the building code or ordinance. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webster v. HeimAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Dodd v. NazarowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API