Legal Opinion

Heitman v. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 20, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The writ of error is to a judgment in favor of defendant in error in the sum of $3,000.00 as compensation for injuries received' in an automobile collision which occurred at the intersection of Bartow Avenue and State Road No. 17 in Auburndale, Florida.

The plaintiff in error submits that there, are five (5)-questions to be determined by us in this case. The first question is: . .

“Was the verdict of the jury against the law as enunciated in the following charge to the jury:
“ ‘Now, the first plea of the defendant is that of not guilty. That places the burden of proof, upon the plaintiff-in this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Holstun & Son v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. McSwain v. HowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Broxson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Florida Trust & Banking Co. v. Consolidated Title Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Futterman v. GerberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. FORESIGHT ENTER. v. Leisure Time Prop.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. In re the Estate of RichmondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Mascarenas v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API