Legal Opinion

Salome v. Eidal Manufacturing Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1965No. 7651PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

The defendants appeal from a judgment awarding workmen’s compensation benefits for partial permanent disability of the body as a whole, allegedly resulting from an injury to a scheduled member, in this instance, the plaintiff’s right foot.

The pertinent findings read:

“1. Plaintiff suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on November 21, 1962 when a trailer hitch fell on his right foot.”
“4. That from the time of his injury through the date of trial, Plaintiff received weekly medical treatments and has not yet been discharged by his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Boggs v. D & L CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gonzales v. Gackle Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sisneros v. Breese Industries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Tank & Steel Corp. v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Casados v. Montgomery Ward & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Witcher v. Capitan Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Baker v. Shufflebarger & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Webb v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API