Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pierce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The Onondaga County Commissioner of Social Services contends that the preferred creditor status granted by subdivision 1 of section 104 of the Social Services Law and SCPA 1811 (subd 2, par [a]) mandates that the county’s lien filed against the deceased debtor’s estate is superior to the respondent Crouse-Irving Hospital’s judgments, which were docketed during decedent’s lifetime. We disagree. Subdivision 1 of section 104 of the Social Services Law grants to the Social Service agency a preference over the “general creditors” of a recipient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. In re the Estate PierceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  3. In re the Estate of GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SwingearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Accounting of RobinsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API