Legal Opinion
Kaminsky v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 19, 1996, as granted the cross motion of the defendant City of New York to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it and denied her cross motion for leave to serve an amended notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs payable by the respondent City of New York, the cross motion of the City of New York is denied, the plaintiffs cross motion is granted, and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klobnock v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lord v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Santarpia v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Herrera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Illera v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lomax v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hernandez v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Seraita v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ruark v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018