Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Gold

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1972No. 3809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff purchased a dwelling owned and occupied by defendant. When defendant vacated the premises, he removed two colored glass “doors” which were located between the den and the living room. Plaintiff filed this suit to recover the “doors”. The city judge granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant appealed.

The issue is whether the alleged “doors” were immovable within the contemplation of the relevant articles of our Civil Code If so, they were conveyed to plaintiff as part of the dwelling. Defendant contends they are not actually “doors” but, instead, are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kay v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Smith v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. LaFleur v. ForetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferina v. HowardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. McGill v. GriffithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API