Legal Opinion

NJ CURE v. Estate of Hamilton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 11, 2009No. A-0964-08T3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

970 A.2d 1051 (2009)

407 N.J. Super. 247

NJ CURE, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

The ESTATE OF Robert HAMILTON, Defendant, and

Albert DeNeve, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.

No. A-0964-08T3

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 25, 2009.

Decided May 11, 2009.

Glenn W. Banks, Mahwah, argued the cause for appellant (Tuttle & Zisgen, attorneys; Mr. Banks, of counsel and on the briefs).

Paul I. Konopka, argued the cause for respondent (Melli, Guerin & Wall, P.C., attorneys; Kenneth L. O'Donnel, Jr., Paramus, of counsel; Cheryl A. Binosa, on the brief).

Before Judges PAYNE,[1] WAUGH and NEWMAN.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL v. NasonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DORIS CANALES VS. YUE YU VS. CHARLES HAYWOOD (L-2779-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API