Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Borough of Pleasantville v. Atlantic City & Suburban Traction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 11, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The chief legal bar set up by the defendant to the allowance of the writ prayed for by the relator is that the duties sought to be enforced by such writ rest wholly upon the contract of the parties or, at least, arise out of a quasi-contractual relation between them. The duties sought to be enforced by mandamus in the present case are similar in their nature to those enforced by that writ in the recent case of Rutherford v. Hudson River Traction Co., 44 Vroom 227. They are duties that arose from the terms of the conditions contained in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rehill v. Mayor of East NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Mayor of Wilbur v. Trenton Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Mayor of Newark v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Hoos v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. City of Marion v. Marion Light & Heating Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Grosso v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Washington ex rel. City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API