Legal Opinion

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1989No. 88-876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of his sentence imposed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 for a conviction of grand theft. Appellant contends that his juvenile aftercare post-commitment program does not constitute legal constraint under Rule 3.701(d)(6). We reverse on authority of Ellison v. State, 547 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Appellant is a juvenile offender who was adjudicated delinquent and was placed in the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys. Upon completion of the term of that penalty and release from the Dozier school he was placed on juvenile “aftercare.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API