Legal Opinion

Van Etten v. Butt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Groff, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The plaintiff in error brought his action against the defendant in error to recover the sum of $90.60, with interest, as a balance alleged to be due him for services rendered as an attorney at law for and at the request of the defendant. The items charged in the plaintiff’s account amount, in the aggregate, to the sum of $294.90, against which the defendant is credited in the petition with several cash items, amounting to $202.30.

The defendant in his answer denies that he is in indebted to the plaintiff in any sum whatever; admits that he employed the plaintiff to defend an attachment suit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dorrington v. MinnickNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. LawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Huffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Berneker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Dumontier v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cantillon v. City of CincinnatiOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API