Legal Opinion

Richmond Plaza Associates v. Santucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered on or about February 21, 1992, granting plaintiffs motion, pursuant to CPLR 3213, for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant failed to rebut plaintiffs prima facie showing that the promissory note was valid and that defendant failed to make payment in accordance with its terms (see, Kornfeld v NRX Technologies, 93 AD2d 772, 773, affd 62 NY2d 686). Defendant’s conclusory allegation that his investment subscription was fraudulently obtained is of no avail because the alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kornfeld v. NRX Technologies, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kornfeld v. NRX Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Fopeco, Inc. v. General Coatings Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camofi Master LDC v. College Partnership, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API