Legal Opinion
United States v. Hefti
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 13, 1988No. 87-1220C(6)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GUNN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on petitioners’ motion to reduce fine to judgment and for issuance of a bench warrant and on respondents’ motion to dismiss order to show cause re contempt. The Court held a hearing on July 1, 1988 to consider the merits of the parties’ respective motions. After considering the evidence adduced at the hearing and the arguments advanced by the parties, the Court now grants petitioners’ motion and denies respondents’ motion.
On July 15, 1986, Revenue Agent R. Michael Williamson, one of the petitioners herein, issued summonses to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- N.A. Sales Company, Inc. v. Chapman Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. DaveyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, George Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HeftiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Bell v. YoungDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Hefti v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Powerlift Door Consultants, Inc. v. ShepardDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- United States of America, Brenda Kessel, Revenue Agent, I.R.S., Agent, I.R.S. v. Charles R. Hefti and Marion Hefti, United States of America and R. Michael Williamson, Revenue Agent, I.R.S. v. Charles R. Hefti and Marion HeftiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989