Legal Opinion

Laney v. Fairview City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2002No. 981729Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 P.3d 1007 (2002)

2002 UT 79

Rhonda Lee LANEY, individually and as guardian ad litem of S.B. and R.A., minors, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FAIRVIEW CITY, a municipal corporation, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 981729.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 9, 2002.

Rehearing Denied October 29, 2002.

Brent D. Young, Provo, for plaintiff.

Andrew M. Morse, Keith A. Call, Salt Lake City, for defendant.

Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Brent A. Burnett, Asst. Att'y Gen., Salt Lake City, for amicus the State of Utah.

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

ถ 1 This case addresses whether Utah Code Ann. ง 63-30-2(4)(a) (Supp.2000) violates…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API