Legal Opinion

Phaholyothin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1982No. 81-1089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

Chawalit and Chaunpim Phaholyothin (plaintiffs) brought this action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (defendant) to recover upon an automobile insurance policy between the parties. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appeal.

The well-pleaded and pertinent facts alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint are “accepted as true.” (Soules v. General Motors Corp. (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 282, 284, 402 N.E.2d 599.) On or about October 3, 1979, a person representing himself as “Curtis Benson” indicated he would purchase plaintiffs’ 1976 Datsun automobile for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. FrankartIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. First National Bank v. Victor Comptometer Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Modern Sounds & Systems, Inc. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PridgenSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Bohnen International Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Pridgen v. Bill Terry's Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API