Legal Opinion

United States v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 23, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). This action is brought in equity. The bill is grounded in equity. The prayer is for equitable relief, and where it is .for legal relief must be incidental to the equitable relief asserted. This case can only proceed in equity, and as an election on the part of the plaintiff to have the patent and mesne conveyances set aside and for incidental damages, until it is 'transferred to the law side (rule 22, new series) and necessary amendments made to convert it into a legal action for damages. Friederichsen v. Renard, 247 U. S. 210, 38 Sup. Ct. 450, 62 L. Ed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API