In re Sack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
By decision dated June 24, 2010, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year (Matter of Sack, 74 AD3d 1697 [2010]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.
Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with the Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re SackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010