Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 130.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RIESER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser,

1995-Ohio-67.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter. (No. 94-2650—Submitted January 24, 1995—Decided May 3, 1995.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 94-16. __________________ {¶ 1} Relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent, David Paul Rieser of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney

Registration No. 0025247,

with two…