Legal Opinion
Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1931Published
1Opinion of the Court
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Whitmyer, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of claim, on the ground that the claimant was not in the course of the employment when injured. (Johnson v. Faribault Bldg. Corp., 192 App. Div. 929; revd. on dissenting opinion below, 229 N. Y. 626; Culhane v. Economical Garage Co., 188 App. Div. 1.)
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Culhane v. Economical Garage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Matter of Johnson v. . Faribault Building CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Claim of Johnson v. Faribault Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920