Legal Opinion

Echols v. Craig

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 4, 2017No. 14-1829PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Derrick Echols, an Illinois inmate, claims in this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that prison dentist Dr. Frederick Craig (an employee of Wexford Health Sources) violated the Eighth Amendment by providing dental care with deliberate indifference to Echols’ serious health needs. While Dr. Craig was extracting a wisdom tooth, a drill bit broke. Dr. Craig sutured Echols’ gum with gauze and at least one half-inch long piece of the broken bit still inside, where it caused pain for about two weeks before it was finally removed.

Knowledge is the key issue in this lawsuit. Echols…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Tyrone Petties v. Imhotep CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Berry v. PetermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sidney Peterson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Puget Bioventures, LLC v. Biomet Orthopedics LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018
  3. Burton v. Chicago Public SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. CONCEPCION v. RUSSELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Dumont v. DoeDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API