Legal Opinion
Sneed v. Board of Professional Responsibility
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2010No. M2009-00720-SC-R3-CVPublishedCited by 358 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIA A. CLARK, J„
delivered the opinion of the court,
in which JANICE M. HOLDER, C.J., and GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.
In this direct appeal of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding involving eight separate complaints, we must determine whether the trial court correctly affirmed the hearing panel’s finding that attorney Michael Sneed violated numerous ethical rules and should be disbarred from the practice of law. Sneed contends that his disciplinary proceedings were procedurally unlawful because the hearing panel did not (1) conduct a prehearing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petition of BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Memphis v. Civil Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Beard v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by358 opinions
- Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Neal Lovlace v. Timothy Kevin CopleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Kristen Cox MORRISON v. Paul ALLEN Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CrossTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Timothy Kenneth Bartley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
353 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.