Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Davis
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. Plaintiff in error filed a motion for a rehearing of the above ease, which motion the court heard during its session in December, 1885, and then filed the opinion, infra.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
We have reexamined the instructions of the trial court, and are now convinced that the same may have operated to the prejudice of the railroad company. Among other things, the court charged the jury that—
“ The mere fact that the same men were officers of the defendant company, and also of the Wichita & Western Railroad Company, is not sufficient evidence to justify a finding that the two companies were one and the same; and if the evidence shows that the Wichita & Western Railroad Company was a corporation duly created and organized under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newport & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. CochranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Chapman v. Western Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Southern Kansas & Panhandle Railroad v. TownerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.