Legal Opinion

Opinion on Motion for Judgment on Supersedeas Bond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1916Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Salmon C. Aldred, obtained a judgment in the lower court against the defendant, Geo. M. Werline, for the sum of $2,377.75, with interest at 6 per cent. from the 29th day of January, 1914. This proceeding in error was commenced to review said judgment and a supersedeas bond was executed, approved, and filed by Geo. M. Werline, as principal, and Chas. Nelson, D.P. Cotter, and E.L. Thompson, as sureties, and execution on said judgment stayed. The case was affirmed by this court heretofore, and a motion has been made for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond. Under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Starr v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Brown v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API