Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matte v. Power Rig Drilling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1972No. 3731Published

1DissentDomengeaux, Judge

I respectfully disagree with my brothers of the majority.

This is a case situation where there were no witnesses to the accident. The plaintiff was the only one to testify as to the occurrence of the accident. We should be guided, therefore, by the general proposition set out in the jurisprudence that a workmen’s compensation claimant can prove the occurrence of an accident solely by his own testimony but only if there is nothing to discredit the claimant’s testimony and only if his testimony is corroborated by the surrounding circumstances. Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co., La.App.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guilbeaux v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Lewis v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Clark v. Glenwood Hospital, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API