Legal Opinion

Beck v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were jointly indicted and convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses and each was sentenced to serve three years in the State Penitentiary.

The first question raised by the assignments which we will dispose of is that the evidence preponderates against the verdict arid judgment below. The State’s proof presents a picture of a very clever scheme executed by these three defendants by which the prosecutor, Ike L. Moore, was bilked of $7,000 in money. Beck, operating under the alias of L. E. Berry, initiated the scheme by contacting Moore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pierce v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. White v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Watson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LequireCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. State v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. KennerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Horn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API