Legal Opinion

United States v. John E. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2006No. 03-1709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Booker v. United States, 543 U.S. 220, 233, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), which declared that the mandatory application of the Guidelines based on judge-found facts violates the Sixth Amendment. Having done as directed by the Court and considered Davis’s sentence in light of Booker, we reinstate our panel opinion and affirm Davis’s conviction and sentence.

The facts of the case are set out in our prior panel opinion at United States v. Davis, 357 F.3d 726 (8th Cir.2004), cert.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Howard Eugene LinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Ashton OslundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2008
  3. United States v. Richard A. OslundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API