Dotter v. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm that portion of the summary final judgment dismissing appellants’ counterclaim. The trial court’s order modifying the terms of rescission was proper under 15 U.S.C.A. § 1635(b). As stated in Williams v. Homestake Mortgage Co., 968 F.2d 1137, 1141 (11th Cir.1992),
Congress, through its legislative history, has made it quite clear that “the courts, at any time during the rescission process, may impose equitable conditions to insure that the consumer meets his obligations after the creditor has performed his obligations as required by the act.”
(quoting S.Rep. No. 368, 96th Cong., 2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Annie Mae Williams v. Homestake Mortgage Co., Ignacio Goldemberg and Adriana GoldembergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Johnson v. CLAIMS PREVENTON & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996