Legal Opinion

Lamson v. Habbart

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 7, 1945No. 114; Alias No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

If the present plaintiff is the holder of said note in due course, then, concededly, each and every one of the indorsers is or may be liable to such holder. This does not mean that their liability as indorsers is of the same quality or equal in all respects. This may depend in some degree upon whether the obligation of such indorsers is joint, several, or joint and several. It is únnecessary to consider the exact nature of this obligation. If it was joint, then clearly all those bound by a joint liability should be joined as parties defendant. '…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph's Polish Catholic Beneficial Society v. Saint Hedwig's ChurchSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  2. Gale v. MyersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bank of Delaware v. NMD Realty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Franklin National Bank v. ScottSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Elmwood Federal Savings Bank v. Forest Manor Estates, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API