Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Martinez.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 3, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00307Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00307-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED IN PART 14 MARIA MARTINEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF NO. 16) 16 17 On March 5, 2019, Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”) filed this suit against Defendants 18 Maria Martinez a/k/a Maria Lourdes Martinez Vasquez d/b/a Accesorios Martinez (“Defednant 19 Martinez”) and TBS Properties, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) for alleged violations of the 20…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.