Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1975PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

Defendants Ralph Bernard Thompson and Parke, Davis & Company (Parke, Davis) appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered upon a jury verdict, which, inter alia, awarded plaintiff Janet Vincent damages in the amount of $300,000 for personal injuries allegedly sustained by her as the result of the administration by Dr. Thompson of a quadruple vaccine called Quadrigen, manufactured by Parke, Davis. The action has been settled as against Dr. Thompson.1 We reverse the judgment as to Parke, Davis, on the law, and grant a new trial as against it.

In Tinnerholm v Parke, Davis &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Tinnerholm v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Fleury v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Tydings v. Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ezagui v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. Rosenfeld v. A. H. Robins Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API