Persons v. Kruger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal, by the defendants, Edward H. Kruger and Fredericka Becker, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 15th day of -October, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered after a trial at the Erie Trial Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 14th day of November, 1898, denying the defendants’ motion for a iiew trial made upon the minutes.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by the defendants, Edward H. Kruger and Fredericka Becker, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Erie on the 15th day of -October, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered after a trial at the Erie Trial Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 14th day of November, 1898, denying the defendants’ motion for a iiew trial made upon the minutes. Issues of fact were brought to trial at the Erie Trial Term, and a verdict was directed against the defendant Fredericka Becker for…
1Opinion of the Court
Hardin, P. J.:
No brief has been submitted in behalf of the appellant Predericka Becker. We have looked into the evidence given at the trial and are satisfied that it was sufficient to warrant the trial judge in ordering a verdict .against Predericka Becker, and, therefore, the motion for a new trial made by her upon the minutes was properly denied, and the judgment and order, so far as she is concerned, should be affirmed. ■
The appellant- Kruger raises a question as to whether ■ the evidence was sufficient to show that any notices of protest were served upon Andrew Brown, his agent, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McLean v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899