Legal Opinion

Backus v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1910No. 2300; 2301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. November 11, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. The defendants were tried jointly for a violation of a municipal ordinance. They were not represented by counsel, and the witnesses against them were not cross-examined, and one of the defendants was not served with a summons. Held, no error requiring the grant of another trial, where there was no request by either defendant for a separate trial, and no request to be allowed to cross-examine any of the witnesses, or refusal of such request, and where the defendant who was not served with a summons did not demand to be served with one before the trial. Venable v. Atlanta, ante, 190 (66 S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. WimbishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Venable v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Town of KestlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Stephens v. City of CrawfordvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API