Legal Opinion

Alta Wind I Owner Lessor C v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 8, 2016No. 13-402T, 13-917T, 13-935T, 13-972T, 14-47T, 14-93T, 14-174T, 14-175TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Section 1603 Recovery Act Claim for 30 Percent Energy Cash Grants; Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Assert Counterclaims Based Upon Expert’s Analysis; Effect on Scope of Issues at Trial.

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AMEND PLEADINGS TO ASSERT COUNTERCLAIMS

WHEELER, Judge.

These consolidated cases involve the determination of the cash grants due Plaintiffs for investing in wind power facilities in California. Under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“Recovery Act”), Pub.L. No. 111-5,123 Stat. 115, Plaintiffs are entitled to a 30 percent cash grant of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mayeaux v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API