Legal Opinion

Bauernfiend v. Jonas

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — Hon. S. M. Ladd, Judge. Action for the possession and right of occupancy of certain, church property, and' to restrain the defendants from interfering therewith. Decree for defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

1

2 This is an, equitable action, triable de novo in this court. There is a controversy as to the sufficiency of the record for that purpose. The certificate of the trial judge to the evidence was never filed in the district court. The original abstract 'by appellants containis a statement that it is one of 'all the evidence offered or introduced -on the trial, 'and is, in form, sufficient, for the purpose of an abstract, to- justify a trial anew in this court. App ellees present an alb stract denying the correctness of appellants’ abstract in the following piarticular: “The certificate of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kavalier v. MachulaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Teague v. FortschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doyle v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API