Citizens for Clean Industry, Inc. v. Lofton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Petitioners assign error to six of the various conclusions of law in Judge Cashwell’s order. Basically though, petitioners present two questions: (1) whether they are legally entitled to an administrative hearing in OAH concerning the DOA decision, and (2) whether they are legally entitled to an administrative hearing in OAH concerning the permitting decision of DEHNR.
The purpose of an EA is to provide DEHNR with a decision making tool to determine if a planned project is of such significance or scope and impact on the environment as to require the preparation of an EIS.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Orange County v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Batten v. N.C. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Lanier v. VinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State ex rel. Tennessee Department of Health & EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State of Tenn. v. ENVIRON. MANAGEMENT COM'NCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Empire Power Co. v. N. C. Department of EnvironmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Empire Power Co. v. N.C. Department of Environment, Health & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Save Our Rivers, Inc. v. Town of HighlandsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994